Zeitgeist Magazine, for the story behind the news
Issue 42,
Volume 8,
11 March 302 AP

The Story behind the news.
Edition
Business
Belson's Gross profits
Share market soaring
How the Belson result is good for all


Politics
The politics of Belson
Angorit hints again


Law
How will Tax Office cope with CimRail?

International Cimera's Privatisation crusade?
Rovens' Weissman; will he survive?

Sport
Vexgame blues
Football: still a mess


Subscribe to Zeitgeist
Subscriber queries

What IS a Zeitgeist?

Jerman for "Spirit of the Age". In this case it is to mean the "spirit" of the Utanian people, the magazine reporting the people's thoughts behind the press-releases and reported news.

Want an article published?

Would you like an article published by Zeitgeist Magazine? Please send the text of the article for evaluation, OR send us an email describing the issue/story you would like published to the email Editor@jaggedblue.com.


©Zeitgeist Magazine, 302 AP.
Email:
Editor@jaggedblue.com


<TECH>
©Mike Ham, 2002. All rights reserved. No reproduction without, at least, tacit approval. ;-)
Will Weissman Survive more than six months?

President Weissman has stepped into a legacy of short-lived Presidents, both with high hopes and a strong desire to reform the country, but both brought low by popular opposition; one by people-power after the Penyassa assassination, and the other by the ballot box. Zeitgeist Magazine looks in this article at the keys to his predecessors' downfalls and asks the question: what will make Weissman different?

President Weissman has been a busy man. In only two weeks he has brought together ten political parties to act as a cohesive whole, as a centrist (and virulently anti-communist) government. Will he survive? His two predecessors did not serve their entire terms. They were ousted within months. What will stop Weissman being the third such President?

Determination is not enough, for President Kope was the king of determination. In his acceptance speech in September last year, the President stood, his chest puffed in defiance, and dared the communists or the militarists to *try* and take the country from the grasp of the people. He understood more clearly than his predecessor, the mood of the country. They were sick of the factions playing a tit-for-tat war against eachother. It had to stop. Because he succeeded in stopping it, is that why Kope is now languishing on the backbench?

Keeping the dogs happy: Kope's failure

President Kope understood the people's needs, but he didn't balance the play. He played too much offence, to use the sporting analogy, and not enough defence in his home court. He didn't play politics, didn't smooth the political path. He was a man of action, a man of few but very well-placed words, and effectively told the politicians he didn't need them -- the people were on his side. His popularity is still a strong 66% (total approval), compared to President Weissman's 40%, and remains the strongest of all potential leaders. Yet, when the politicians got together to discuss who would be team captain, Kope was out on his own. Even his own party (the Peoples Party of Gvonj (PPG)) was reluctant to suggest him.

Part of this has much to do with whom he was elected by. President Kope was backed by the communists, and no one backed by the communists can EVER be any good, goes the anti-communist rhetoric. Certainly Weissman seems to believe it, forever alienated from Kope by the fact that the latter apparently betrayed the "moderate's cause" by seeking power by being backed by the enemy. No one can be completely sure why Kope sought communist support for his candidacy, but certainly the politicians have never trusted him since, and he has never felt the need to explain himself. Afterall, who are they, these mere politicians, for him to justify himself to? The People were on his side.

Another possible reason President Kope was forced to the backbench is that he was too clearly focused on one goal: an end to the war with the communists. He had no "beyond" agenda, no plan for the economy, no plan to revitalise industry, to export the country to a happier future. Upon his election he listed only three very short-term goals to complete -- elections, seeking peace by halving the size of the military, and finding Penyassa's assasin -- as though he was willing the electorate to see him as a "fill-in President". Who wants a single minded President?

Certainly, his dogged pursuit of the military, at the risk of the country's security, while cosying to the communists deeply biased many conservatives and centrists against him.

So, will President Weissman fair better? He has certainly played better politics, making sure that all parties in his very broad coalition feel accepted and a part of the cabinet. He has certainly proven his credentials as an anti-communist, using the bogey as the reason for the coalition in the first place. And his goals for his administration are certainly broader than Kope's: economy, unemployment, peace with Patak, and an end to the persecution of the military. This latter point goes a long way toward proving his commitment to defending the country, and to being prepared to fight the communists again, to having some leverage to apply on them.

So, he is no President Kope, in fact, much the opposite. And if he is Kope's opposite, he must be like the hapless President K'yonte?!

President K'yonte II?

When President K'yonte arrived in office he committed himself to three primary tasks, much like President Weissman: the economy, and sharing it fairly, development of the country's infrastructure and peace with the communists, but not at any cost. Sounding familiar?

"I will commit myself to the task of revitalising the national economy, and expanding the wealth that this brings, so that all may share in it." said President Weissman a few days ago, just over a year after President K'yonte pledged to do the same.

Like K'yonte, he has also promised to talk with the communists, and will make some concessions -- such as a general amnesty and improved social services nationwide so that the Pataki, who enjoy excellent services under the communists, do not lose out -- but will not concede their equality with the Haastadt government.

In addition, President Weissman has the same concensus approach of his second-to-immediate-predecessor: keeping the politicians happy will keep the people happy.

So, can we expect President Weissman to fall in July to an angry population tired of the lack of progress?

Well, unless the demoralised military is planning another assassination of another "Rhosei Penyassa" figure, then perhaps the conditions will not be brought about. But, the angry protests of a million people or more were not as much about the injustice against Penyassa, as the stagnation of the government.

Weissman appears to be solving that problem with a far more active inner cabinet, filled with "go-getters" and potential leaders. He seems readier to dispose of those who fail to act, too. In addition, his Finance/Economy Minister, Adolph Gottlieb, is a real find, a man with sound skills to tackle the rapidly deflating economy.

So, will President Weissman succeed where Kope and K'yonte did not?

It is the considered opinion of this magazine to say, unequivocally, "perhaps".

Perhaps... Weissman's REAL problem

The real trouble for Mr Weissman lies not in his cabinet, nor his own skills or characteristics. It would appear that he has focused appropriately on the failures of his predecessors, and learned from their mistakes. He is a strong but firmly diplomatic leader, and has assembled a crafty, skilled cabinet.

It's his "Green Coalition" that will be his "Achilles Heel" for the duration of his government. How focused on the "big picture" will they remain? How long will it be before they start asking for their own "special considerations", their own pet expenditures? How long before the miniscule Independence for the Pataki Party (IPP, 8 MNAs) demands concessions of its own, or a special R100 million spending package, and threatens to withhold support from the coalition?

The "Green coalition" is so finely tuned that it could take only one party, one of the ten, to bring the whole government down. And heaven forbid that it should be one of the four main parties, stretching from the leftist PIMR to the conservative DUP.

President Weissman will have to devote significant time of his own to nurturing that coalition, and not "play a Kope", taking the various factions for granted. One slip could bring his whole card-house down, and with it, the possibilities his government offers.

So, watch this year for the cracks to appear, and then watch Weissman closely. His ear should be close to the ground, and his hearing finely tuned to keep this train on the tracks. If he fails to keep the factions tightly in place, predict failure ahead. His diplomacy will keep the country on track.

Yet, should he fail, the only alternative, much to Weissman's disgust, is a communist-lead coalition with the PIMR. Perhaps Kope will get a second shot? Unlikely. One reserve power, one bullet, remains in Weissman's Presidential crown that might prevent that: he alone has the power to call an early election. If pushed between the prospect of a communist government and fresh elections, there should be no debate as to which President Weissman will choose.

Here's to hoping this is one silver bullet he never has to use. External confidence in the country cannot take too many more beatings.
Related links:

Jagged Blue

Utanian Government site

Zeitgeist magazine

Utanian Press Agency (at the moment)

Recent Editions:

Analysis: Governor Cryer - Mr Popular

Angorit wooed for his influence

Rovens: an analysis of the chances for peace

Stock Exchange:
Luka Stock Exchange, March 23rd

Stocks continue to stagnate - when will the Govt. release cash controls?

Belson, Utania's largest food processing company. Link to homepage.