Inflation still rising
Share market blips
Okarvit's policy gamble
How will Tax Office cope with CimRail?
Aethelnia's radical Tobin Law
Rovens: Tensions rise over DMZ incursions
To Vexcup or not to Vecup?
Football: Isaston's change of heart
Subscribe to Zeitgeist
What IS a Zeitgeist?
Jerman for "Spirit of the Age". In this case it is to mean the "spirit" of the Utanian
people, the magazine reporting the people's thoughts behind the press-releases and reported
Want an article published?
Would you like an article published by Zeitgeist Magazine? Please send the text of the
article for evaluation, OR send us an email describing the issue/story you would like
published to the email Editor@jaggedblue.com.
It is the policy of this magazine not to identify the authors of any Zeitgeist articles.
It was conceived in the early days of this magazine, by our founder, Mr van der Hamm, when
authors were being threatened by Guwimithian Authorities for their anti-Imperialist columns.
Our founder endured jail time in Imperial prisons for his "insolence". Now, the policy is
to demonstrate that this is a magazine, not a collection of authors.
© Zeitgeist Magazine, 302 AP.
©Mike Ham, 2002. All rights reserved. No reproduction without, at least, tacit approval. ;-)
Okarvit's policy gamble
President Okarvits announced on Friday evening a series of radical measures
he would introduce if given a second term as President that will reform the country in
the space of a few years. But, they are something of a gamble. The President is hoping
to secure the support of his own coalition, particularly disaffected Utani, and hold his
voter base in the Utani community without alienating the rest of the country.
President Okarvits speech on Friday evening, to say the least, was stunning. The
President effectively gave in on many of the policy demands of Utani nationalists and
others demanding real and tangible change in Utania, reversing many of the historical
injustices of the past three hundred years.
The following morning, one of the President's own MPs stood against him
in the nomination race in protest at the radical agenda that would effectively deprive
Uta-Decashi of their farming land, and arguably greatly impact the Utanian agricultural
industry on which our positive trade balance is so heavily dependent. Worse yet, the
renegade challenger got as many as 13% of the conference votes, when the President was
expected to get in excess of 95%.
So, why would the President risk alienating so many voters with such a radical
agenda? But, firstly, what has he proposed?
The most radical of his proposals was land reform. Precisely like the system in
place for foreign owners, the President is proposing that Uta-Decashi farmer's land be
returned to their Utani tribal owners, and that a lease be agreed that provides them
usage rights for a set period.
"This will provide a sound basis for the farmer to continue his business, while
providing an additional lease income for local Utani communities", the President told
the conference. "It will be a win-win situation for agriculture and Utani alike."
Though it received wild applause from many Utani at the conference, there were
considerable numbers stunned by the proposed announcement. By the President's own
admission, there was no detail in the policy because he has no intention of "imposing"
a mandate without considerable -- read "years of" -- community consultation. Yet, that
it will be Presidential policy means that it will become law, if ratified by the
Parliament, in one form or another.
Land reform, that is, the return of lands confiscated by Guwimithian authorities
for non-Utani, has long been a rallying cry of Utani Nationalists, even before
independence, and some Uta-Decashi. Thus, the President's inaction on the topic has
caused a great deal of angst for government coalition Utani MPs trying to justify how
the President IS different to any other party's leader. Thus, it has constantly been
a thorn in the side for the President.
The reason is that the President is firmly of the conviction that Utani
revolution was not an option, and, to be sure, many Utani expected a whirlwind of
radical change in the first few years of independence. That they would be returned their
lands, that the Esreni (lit. "foreigners") who has economically exploited them and their
land would be expelled, or, at least, forced to live under Utani rule. The country WAS,
afterall, named Utani-a.
President Okarvits, backed by a moderate Utani nationalist party, the Utani-Saedaj,
and his own moderately-leftist Peoples Party, was convinced that Utani and Uta-Decashi
had to live side-by-side, in peaceful co-existence. In addition, he and his
coalition were firmly convinced that "rule of law" must be obeyed, that land occupations
and other attempts to force the government's hand would not be tolerated.
The opposite end of the spectrum, one place short of the "doing nothing" solution
that many Uta-Decashi hoped the President would follow, was to buy Uta-Decashi lands off
the owners, as a cost of some Û1,100 billion.
In fact, Zeitgeist Magazine considered these possibilities in earlier editions,
including the July 1st edition, praising the
President's "open-handed" approach. In that edition, the Tobacco Farmers Federation said
the idea of exchanging land-for-leases would "destroy" agriculture in Utania. Utanian
Farmers Federation members declared the biggest threat to farming was land being
confiscated without compensation.
Yet, the Utanian Business and Economic Foundation, a progressive Utani think-tank,
told Zeitgeist that farmers could still be given loan guarantee rights to a portion of
the land they once owned.
This issue has been stalking the President for years. If he fails to act, Utani
may make good their threats to take land by force, or, worse-yet elect their own radical
Utani leader to the Presidency. And their anger and dissatisfaction with the President's
"do nothing" approach has been building for months.
Now, the President has agreed to do something, and it is the farmers' turn to
get angry and disatisfied with the President's approach. The question for the President
is how strong the wider community's reaction will be: will pro-reform Utani votes outnumber
Ever since Belson Corporation announced a Û33 billion profit in March, Utani
MPs have declared that they have "had enough", and have been actively campaigning within
the government to have the company nationalised, that is, to have the government take
over ownership of the company. The past three days of conference speeches have been
heavily flavoured with talk of Belson and nationalisation.
Yet, Peoples Party moderates in the coalition are appalled at the idea, not to
mention those in the conservative parties. To Liberal Nationalist MPs, Belson should
be seen as an Utanian success story, a flagship that can take the Utanian brand-name
But, opponents point out that all this success has come at the price of the Utani
farming communities that have been receiving less payment from Belson for their produce
than Belson itself makes in profit off those items. Belson, they say, is bloated and
inefficient because it really makes Û60 billion in profit off farmers that it
"I have heard your pleas, I have heard the cries of the many who suffer at the
hands of the Belson produce contracts. Belson is the largest recipient of farm produce
in this country, and its contracts are one-sided", the President told the cheering
"Therefore, I will introduce a Bill to the Parliament that will, effective
June 30, 303ap, make null and void all Belson and other company's negotiated
The roar from the conference masses could be heard outside the Conference stadium.
This web-based version of the article was abridged. For a complete version, see
the latest Edition of Zeitgeist Magazine, on sale now. Only Û10.00.
Stocks continue to stagnate - when will the Govt. release cash controls?